Embezzlement
in councils: When SDOs are accomplices
A whirlpool
of scandals bordering on
embezzlement, fraud, misappropriation, swindling, scam and rip-offs is flooding
through the sluice gates of councils. They are municipalities supervised by senior
divisional officers with the purpose to ensure transparency and accountability
in the management of municipalities which are often referred to as grassroots
governments. Shouldn’t the scandals ignite some fire fighting reaction from the
Biya administration if emergence by 2035 and decentralization are worth the
drum beats?
There are credible complaints that money allocated to
provide essential potable water in the Muyuka municipality was paid for no work
done. A junk caterpillar bought without going through tenders for 30MFCFA was
supplied to Alou council for 150MFCFA together with a used vehicle paid for as
a new one.
In Buea, 150MFCFA is reported to have been “missing”
from the council and just last week, Tubah councillors said 26 MFCFA was used
to transfer council furniture within a distance of one kilometer. The cases of
theft in councils using several subterfuges is alarming in communities
notorious for bad roads, poor and insufficient drinking water, on-off
electricity and dilapidating classrooms.
The common
denomination in some of the councils is identical. The scandals are being
exposed in councils whose former mayors were flushed out of office at the last
municipal elections and are no longer on seat to cover their filthy tracks. So
what is the guarantee that those who survived for another term have not
fortified the locks on their cupboards?
All 360
councils in Cameroon are supervised by senior divisional officers who are
supposed to ensure that the scam and misappropriation of public funds do not
occur in their municipalities. But the reverse based on the verifiable complaints
is the trend. Shouldn’t the rate at which incidents of malfeasance are cropping
up in councils make the supervisors accomplices? Does the case in the Tubah
council not tally with that preposition?
Nguéle Nguéle Felix, the SDO for Mezam division has
suspended a commission of inquiry set up by Tubah in which he is the
supervising authority to probe how former SDF mayor, Stanislaus Sofa spent some
26 MFCFA to transport few office furniture from the old office to the new one.
The distance between the two points is only a few
kilometres and some councillors say the work could have been done for just
50 000FCFA at the most. Where was the “supervisory” SDO when a contract of
26MFCFA was awarded to transfer the equipment when the law stipulates that
contracts from five million francs most pass through advertised tender?
That is a key question the commission would have
searched for answers but what has raised eyebrows is that the SDO has
“suspended” the commission without a time frame.
His warp logic
is that it was not properly constituted. As council supervisory authority,
where was he when the council was setting up the commission? What was his
advice when such a huge amount for a small council like Tubah was being
allocated to transfer furniture? Was the amount programmed in the budget of the
council or it was a special allocation which the supervisor approved for the
questionable contract? If truly the SDO felt the commission was not properly
constituted, why did he not order that the correction be made immediately or
invite other authorities like CONAC or the supreme state audit to do the
investigation?
Does suspending
the work of the commission not give the impression that the SDO might have
benefitted from the rip-off?
The councillors were embarrassed and flabbergasted when in presenting his record of stewardship, Sofa who notoriously refused to leave office after being voted out said he spent a tidy 26M FCFA to transport council office equipment.
One of the deputy mayors told reporters that “only some files and few items were transferred because the cupboards and most furniture we have in the new chambers were constructed in here”.
The councillors were embarrassed and flabbergasted when in presenting his record of stewardship, Sofa who notoriously refused to leave office after being voted out said he spent a tidy 26M FCFA to transport council office equipment.
One of the deputy mayors told reporters that “only some files and few items were transferred because the cupboards and most furniture we have in the new chambers were constructed in here”.
Such theft of
tax payers’ money is not exclusive to Tubah council or those of Alou, Muyuka,
Buea et al where alarms have been raised. Numerous others may never be exposed
if councils are not frequently audited by independent authorities like the
supreme state audit, MINAT/D, the audit bench of the supreme court and CONAC.
Such audits must be regular and when credible
allegations of irregularities are made by the populace and councilors, the
auditors must act with dispatch. The allegations should not end on council
chamber storming debates and pages of newspapers.
Even when CONAC
is called in like in the case of Alou where the scandals are legion with the
supply of used equipment as new without tender, immediate action is not seen.
That gives the impression to the affected communities that the cheats used some
of their illicit wealth to oil the palms of investigators.
Giving the scandals in councils and the improving
democratisation process, isn’t it time for SDOs who were made supervisors of
councils during the one party system to be stripped off that role? Haven’t the
various scams in councils given justification that SDOs are not effective
supervisors? Are some not even retarding development in councils they
supervise, often demanding huge allowances for attending council sessions and
for signing council budgets?
Why should councils be “supervised” in the first place
when they are truly governments at local levels and its councillors elected
based on a specific programme of action? Doesn’t the number of scandals in
councils cripple the legitimacy and effectiveness of SDOs as supervisors, many
of who are the problems instead of the solution?
With the Biya regime’s pet project to lead Cameroon
to emergence in 2035, the transfer of all ministerial development budgets to councils next year and given the
vortex of scandals in councils, some radical reforms are needed to block the
flood gate of stealing from municipal chambers. Senators must also live up to
their legal responsibility to ensure that cases of malpractices in their
regions are promptly investigated and culprits brought to book so that
Cameroonians can have the feel good effects of emergence and decentralisation.
YoBit lets you to claim FREE CRYPTO-COINS from over 100 different crypto-currencies, you complete a captcha once and claim as many as coins you can from the available offers.
ReplyDeleteAfter you make about 20-30 claims, you complete the captcha and continue claiming.
You can press CLAIM as many times as 50 times per one captcha.
The coins will held in your account, and you can convert them to Bitcoins or any other currency you want.