By
Mbom Sixtus in Yaounde
|
SDF Parliamentary Group officials |
The Social Democratic Front, SDF has admitted its
failure to effect change in Cameroon through the national assembly.
The parliamentary group of the SDF, in a press
statement issued on November 19, has however blamed the party’s failure to
directly bring meaningful reforms through the national assembly, on the fact
that CPDM MPs prevent their proposals (private member bills and draft
resolutions) from getting past the chairmen’s conference to the competent
committees and then to plenary sessions of the assembly for examination and
possible adoption.
The national vice chair of the SDF, Hon. Joshua
Nambangi Osih who read the press statement in the presence of the group leader,
Hon. Joseph Banadzem Lukong, SDF senators and members of parliament, gave to
understanding that they are unable to live up to the expectations of the
citizens they represent, because of the overwhelming majority of the CPDM which
consequently has an ascendancy over the opposition at all decision making
levels at the national assembly.
SDF’s
steady decline
A trip down memory lane indicates that the SDF has
been loosing popularity and consequently loosing strength to effect change in
the national assembly ever since it took part in the 1997 parliamentary
elections. During the 1997 legislative elections, the SDF won 43 seats though
the party cried out that the elections were rigged by the CPDM.
During the 2002 and 2007 parliamentary elections,
the SDF managed to have only a parliamentary group which could not effect any
change in parliament.
In the most recent elections in 2013, the SDF still
failed to increase its number of seats in parliament to a significant figure
that could influence decision making by the country’s legislature. The party
won 18 parliamentary seats; a snail-paced movement from 16 seats in the
previous legislature.
The bi-cameral system of parliament was introduced
in 2013 and as the party puts it, “given the fact that senators were voted by
municipal councillors who won the 2007 flawed elections”, the CPDM emerged with
an absolute majority. The SDF was beaten in its fief, the North West region in
a winner takes all regional elections.
Some analysts related the party’s victory in the Adamawa
and West regions at last year’s senatorial elections to Biya’s kindheartedness.
Yet, others linked it to the president’s cleverness; those who shared this
school of thought said the president wanted the senate to have a semblance of
democracy in the eyes of the international community.
Nevertheless, the Social Democratic Front of John
Fru Ndi, till today, though toothless at the national assembly, has managed to
maintain its grip on the title of the ‘leading opposition party’.
Challenges
SDF can’t surmount
Among the private member bills which had been
submitted over the years at the chairmen’s conference by Hon. Osih and Hon.
Mbah Ndam, but were thrown out by the CPDM, is the bill on the modification of
the labour code. Hon. Osih explained that he and the SDF parliamentary group
proposed that the minimum guaranteed wage should be transformed into a minimum
inter-professional wage that will be intertwined with economic growth. This, he
said, will be revised by employers annually depending on the annual growth rate
of the country.
Going by calculations and extrapolations made by the
SDF vice chair, it was proposed that the amendment of the August 1992 labour
code, should set the minimum salaries at 60.000FCFA in 2015, 80,000FCFA in
2016, 100,000FCFA in 2017, 120,000FCFA in 2018, 140,000FCFA in 2019 and
160,000FCFA in 2020.
Osih and Ndam have also proposed at the on-going
November session of parliament, that the 1968 law on nationality should be
amended. He told the press that this would be beneficial to over 4million
Cameroonians living abroad.
It is stated in the bill that the 1968 law on
nationality which prohibited double nationality for Cameroonians, was voted as
a tool to fight against members of the opposition, most of who were living
abroad. The SDF argues that after Cameroon embraced democracy, the law became
obsolete. It is also stated in the bill that the implementation of the law
against double nationality is discriminatory as it’s not applied on players in
the national team.
The standpoint of the SDF on the issue is that the
1968 law should be amended so that children born into families with two
nationalities one of which is Cameroonian would not be obliged to choose one
nationality. Besides the case of children, the party argues that most Cameroonians
who have two nationalities did not obtain second citizenship because they
rejected their country but because of necessity. The current law, according the
SDF prevents Cameroonians in the Diaspora from effectively participating in the
development of Cameroon even if they wish to.
The SDF has also deposited a bill for the
modification of the 2004 law on decentralization, requesting that the post of
government delegate in urban council should be scrapped. In the bill which was
proposed by Osih and the SDF parliamentary group, it is justified that the
government delegates are appointed by the head of state and pay allegiance to
their appointer and not the people living under their jurisdiction.
The party holds that the appointed government
delegates in 14 major cities in Cameroon control 60% of funds disbursed to be
managed by decentralized municipality, whereas the backbone of decentralization
is the sub-divisional councils. Mayors are voted to head councils and their
actions are guided by the principle of accountability to the electorate.
Decision making is inclusive, democracy and governance is at its best at the
level of the sub-divisional municipalities. The SDF stresses in the bill that
the extinction of the post of delegate and the transformation of the
appellation, ‘urban council’ to city council’ in the 14 major cities would
boost decentralization and make it more than just a concept but a reality in
Cameroon.
Osih and his group mates have also submitted a bill
on the modification of the electoral code which the party has proposed and a
draft resolution for the establishment of a parliamentary commission of inquiry
related to the acquisition of XIAN Mag 60 aircrafts which the government bought
for the CAMAIR-co corporation.
Just like the bills mentioned earlier, the SDF says
the CPDM parliamentary group has blocked the bill at the level of the
chairmen’s conference without even finding out what it contains, an attitude
which, Banadzem says is contrary to the laws and standing orders of the
national assembly.
They want an inquiry into a plane purchase deal
where the transport minister signed an agreement for the purchase of Chinese
planes and the company was later received an inexplicable 20billionFCFA
‘overpayment’ for the aircrafts which experts say are as good as flying
coffins. The planes have been banned in several countries, according to the SDF
vice chair.
Besides CPDM’s alleged efforts in kill the zeal of
SDF members of parliament to effect change through parliament, they are also
accused by socialist party of disrespecting the laws of the land.
The SDF has equally faulted government for
constantly disrespecting sections 21, 35 and 39 of the 2007 law on the fiscal
regime of the state. This involves the examination of settlement bills and
depositing the finance law.
The SDF parliamentary group leader, Banadzem says
parliamentarians usually are not given the required time as stated by the law,
to examine the bill and finance law. He said the 37% execution rate of the
public investment budget this year; down from 50% last year is related to the
poor examination of the budget.
He also refused to comment on statements made by the
Senate President, Marcel Niat Njifenji who, while opening the November session
of parliament at the Senate, said they will not defend their budget before the
finance commission of the lower house of assembly. Though the declarations were
received with criticisms from observers and political analyst in the country
who hold that the senate is suppose to defend its budget as long as the
president is yet to promulgate its standing orders, Banadzem simply said that,
the national assembly is an institution which has well defined channels of
communication. He said that he will only comment when the senate officially
informs them about the decision.