Yaounde maintains suspicious silence
By Sylvanus
Ezieh Acha’ana in Yaounde
Captian Guerandi Mbara |
Despite repeated reports by local and foreign media accusing the
Cameroon secret services of having kidnapped and assassinated the 1984 coup
leader, Captain Guerandi Mbara, government has elected a provocative silence.
According to the Pan-African news magazine, Jeune Afrique, the former junior officer,
author of the failed coup of April 06, 1984 might have been abducted by the
Cameroon secret services while he was trying to get in touch with an arms
merchant.
The allegations linking the death of the coup leader to
government have been described as dangerous and image tainting, necessitating
an immediate clarification from competent government authorities. But by press
time last night, the Yaounde authorities yet to make a statement on the matter.
An independent observer told The Guardian Post that an
eventual government silence over the allegation would give the interpretation
that government services actually assassinated the Grand North elite. Hear him, “Government has to treat issues like this as a
matter of urgency. I know this government as one that reacts swiftly to such
issues. If by this time no official response has yet been made, then it baffles
me. But let’s keep our fingers crossed and wait. It is not yet late.”
Meanwhile, according
to the Jeune Afrique report on the alleged kidnapping and assassination of
Guerandi in its September edition, the Cameroon secret services working for the
general directorate of external research, DGRE were informed of the presence of
the former captain of the republican guard, author of the famous failed coup of
April 06, 1984, in Paris.
According to the report, the former rebel leader who was allegedly arming some 2000 men purportedly for another coup plot had made plans to meet with a renowned arms merchant, Georges Starkman for acquisition of arms.
When the two men met, the latter offered to take Guerandi to Russia for the acquisition of the weapons. While in the aircraft which took off from Porto in Portugal, a powerful sedative was administered to the former captain who fell deeply asleep.
According to the author of the inquiry, Guerandi’s remains were delivered to the agents of the secret services between Pouma and Edea, on the Douala-Yaounde highway on January 25, 2013.
It should be recalled that after the failure of the April 06, 1984 coup which the former captain of the republican guard was sentenced to death in absentia, Guerandi quit Cameroon for Burkina Faso and has since lived under the protection of President Blaise Compaore, his classmate of the Ecole Militaire Interarmes (EMIA) in Yaounde.
According to the report, the former rebel leader who was allegedly arming some 2000 men purportedly for another coup plot had made plans to meet with a renowned arms merchant, Georges Starkman for acquisition of arms.
When the two men met, the latter offered to take Guerandi to Russia for the acquisition of the weapons. While in the aircraft which took off from Porto in Portugal, a powerful sedative was administered to the former captain who fell deeply asleep.
According to the author of the inquiry, Guerandi’s remains were delivered to the agents of the secret services between Pouma and Edea, on the Douala-Yaounde highway on January 25, 2013.
It should be recalled that after the failure of the April 06, 1984 coup which the former captain of the republican guard was sentenced to death in absentia, Guerandi quit Cameroon for Burkina Faso and has since lived under the protection of President Blaise Compaore, his classmate of the Ecole Militaire Interarmes (EMIA) in Yaounde.
Profile of Captain Guerandi
& 1984 coup attempt
30 years ago, a
30-year old army Captain cast in the mold of the young African revolutionary soldiers
of the 1980s rallied young officers in Cameroon in an attempt to overthrow the
Biya regime. After the failure of the coup attempt, that soldier, Captain
Guerandi Mbara, successfully evaded the massive security dragnet of loyalist
forces and made his way to Burkina Faso where his friend and former classmate
at the Yaounde Military Academy, a certain Blaise Compaore had just organized a
successful coup less than a year earlier which brought Captain Thomas Sankara
to power.
Upon arrival in the “land of the incorruptibles", Guerandi did not simply fade away. Instead, he reinvented himself and became an erudite scholar. Today, he holds a doctorate in political science from Université René Descartes in Paris, a DEA in International Relations and Economics from same university, and a DESS in geopolitics and strategic studies from the Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales still in Paris. He now runs a successful international consulting firm and is also a lecturer at the Diplomacy and International Relations Institute (IDRI), the Higher Institute of Economy and the National School of Administration and Magistracy (ENAM), all in Burkina Faso.
Upon arrival in the “land of the incorruptibles", Guerandi did not simply fade away. Instead, he reinvented himself and became an erudite scholar. Today, he holds a doctorate in political science from Université René Descartes in Paris, a DEA in International Relations and Economics from same university, and a DESS in geopolitics and strategic studies from the Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales still in Paris. He now runs a successful international consulting firm and is also a lecturer at the Diplomacy and International Relations Institute (IDRI), the Higher Institute of Economy and the National School of Administration and Magistracy (ENAM), all in Burkina Faso.
Guerandi has however
not forgotten about Cameroon. "I think about Cameroon every five
minutes". Rarely does a month go by that he doesn’t write about or
comments on events in Cameroon. Feared by a regime which has tried
unsuccessfully to have him kicked out of Bukina Faso, rumours of a Guerandi
coup or armed insurrection surface with mathematical regularity in security
circles and in the media. This is a man who rightly or wrongly gives the
Yaounde regime nightmares. As one paranoid government official once put it;
“Guerandi is up to no good; there is only one reason in the world why he
would be interested in 'strategic studies'”…
In April 5, 2009 he
granted an interview to cameroonvoice.com, the Montreal-based Cameroonian
online radio. It was a much anticipated interview, which lived up to its
billing. During the interview, Guerandi threw water on a number of
long held assumptions about the coup and its initiators, and also outlined his
vision of tomorrow’s Cameroon. Here are selected highlights that deal directly
with the coup attempt.
Rationale for the
Coup
We were motivated by a number of factors, some dating back to the colonial period and others to events of the 1980s… Cameroon was already suffering from a sclerosis caused by an organic, hegemonic and even legitimacy crisis. The state was sliding towards what the Anglo-Saxons refer to as a “failed state.” The collapse of the state was already very very visible back then, from the race to plunder state resources to an increase in tribalism and nepotism, etc. Who does not remember the statement “It is now our turn?” Or “the goat eats where it is tethered”? These statements have not ceased. They have instead multiplied today. We hear of percentages, of “gombo” in the media…
Who does not remember the squandering of financial resources under the guise of creating a new ethno-regional bourgeois? Who does not remember the arbitrary arrests? Or, the desire to wipe out certain regions that were targeted by the ethno facists in power? Bamileke and Islamo-peuhl entrepreneurs come to mind.
Who does not remember the judicial proceedings, initiated by those vengeful individuals, which threatened the fragile national cohesion? Who does not remember the sectarian practices within our armed forces and security apparatus which exacerbated the frustrations of the different sociological components [of the country] and created tensions between the different ranks of the armed forces?
Some argue that [at the time of the coup] Paul Biya had not yet found his bearing. Granted. But do they realize that Paul Biya is the continuation of the system? He has an important player within the system since 1962. When he became president, he was well versed with the arcane mysteries of power…
Our primary objective was to prevent the chaos that we are witnessing today and to anticipate solutions to the socio political and economic disorders which were emerging from within the new administration.
Many have wondered what the term “Jose” meant. It is «Jeunes Officiers pour la Survie de l’État» (Young Officers for the Survival of the State). As early as 1975, my comrades had been analyzing the geopolitical situation in Cameroon within secret cells. I cannot say more.
We were motivated by a number of factors, some dating back to the colonial period and others to events of the 1980s… Cameroon was already suffering from a sclerosis caused by an organic, hegemonic and even legitimacy crisis. The state was sliding towards what the Anglo-Saxons refer to as a “failed state.” The collapse of the state was already very very visible back then, from the race to plunder state resources to an increase in tribalism and nepotism, etc. Who does not remember the statement “It is now our turn?” Or “the goat eats where it is tethered”? These statements have not ceased. They have instead multiplied today. We hear of percentages, of “gombo” in the media…
Who does not remember the squandering of financial resources under the guise of creating a new ethno-regional bourgeois? Who does not remember the arbitrary arrests? Or, the desire to wipe out certain regions that were targeted by the ethno facists in power? Bamileke and Islamo-peuhl entrepreneurs come to mind.
Who does not remember the judicial proceedings, initiated by those vengeful individuals, which threatened the fragile national cohesion? Who does not remember the sectarian practices within our armed forces and security apparatus which exacerbated the frustrations of the different sociological components [of the country] and created tensions between the different ranks of the armed forces?
Some argue that [at the time of the coup] Paul Biya had not yet found his bearing. Granted. But do they realize that Paul Biya is the continuation of the system? He has an important player within the system since 1962. When he became president, he was well versed with the arcane mysteries of power…
Our primary objective was to prevent the chaos that we are witnessing today and to anticipate solutions to the socio political and economic disorders which were emerging from within the new administration.
Many have wondered what the term “Jose” meant. It is «Jeunes Officiers pour la Survie de l’État» (Young Officers for the Survival of the State). As early as 1975, my comrades had been analyzing the geopolitical situation in Cameroon within secret cells. I cannot say more.
On his relationship with
President Ahidjo
While in Cameroon, I did not have any relationship with President Ahidjo. I was just a poor officer in the army; I wasn’t even a member of the presidential guards… However, while in exile, I was able to meet him, thanks to two heads of state, and satisfy my need to understand certain events in our history... let me repeat, we did not go to battle in order to return Ahidjo to power. That would have been unthinkable. It was against our ethics and our politics. We knew the role that each and everyone played in the events which marked out the road to Cameroon’s independence. Let’s stop these tales which people use to assuage their conscience or to justify the post April 84 criminal repression. History is always written by the winners. Back then is was a good strategy to stigmatize Ahidjo in a bid to achieve that final victory…
While in Cameroon, I did not have any relationship with President Ahidjo. I was just a poor officer in the army; I wasn’t even a member of the presidential guards… However, while in exile, I was able to meet him, thanks to two heads of state, and satisfy my need to understand certain events in our history... let me repeat, we did not go to battle in order to return Ahidjo to power. That would have been unthinkable. It was against our ethics and our politics. We knew the role that each and everyone played in the events which marked out the road to Cameroon’s independence. Let’s stop these tales which people use to assuage their conscience or to justify the post April 84 criminal repression. History is always written by the winners. Back then is was a good strategy to stigmatize Ahidjo in a bid to achieve that final victory…
On Colonel Saleh
Ibrahim, the alleged coup “ring leader”
The highest ranking members in the “Jose” movement were Captains. Colonel Saleh Ibrahim, whom they executed, Colonel Ngoura Belhadji or Ousmanou Daouda, etc. were simply victims of the grudgeful hatred of Paul Biya’s men. Saleh Ibrahim was not the leader of the coup. In fact, we kept him to under guard in his house to prevent him from leaving. We did this because we understood the mentality of superior officers, their propensity to switch sides. Therefore, we could not involve them in this patriotic venture. The so-called victors had to justify their cruelty by blaming officers from the North. The leadership was a coalition of which the JOSE movement was the frontline, the armed wing. Some of the members were Marxists. This you did not know.
As for Issa Adoum, he was a vital player in obtaining civilian support for the coup, and his designation as head of state resulted from a vote within the higher military council. This does not mean that he would necessarily have become the president in the event of a victory. I am convinced because the majority of our comrades were determined to completely restructure national life. Remember that back then, Africa was in the throes of a series of coups inspired by young revolutionary officers.
The highest ranking members in the “Jose” movement were Captains. Colonel Saleh Ibrahim, whom they executed, Colonel Ngoura Belhadji or Ousmanou Daouda, etc. were simply victims of the grudgeful hatred of Paul Biya’s men. Saleh Ibrahim was not the leader of the coup. In fact, we kept him to under guard in his house to prevent him from leaving. We did this because we understood the mentality of superior officers, their propensity to switch sides. Therefore, we could not involve them in this patriotic venture. The so-called victors had to justify their cruelty by blaming officers from the North. The leadership was a coalition of which the JOSE movement was the frontline, the armed wing. Some of the members were Marxists. This you did not know.
As for Issa Adoum, he was a vital player in obtaining civilian support for the coup, and his designation as head of state resulted from a vote within the higher military council. This does not mean that he would necessarily have become the president in the event of a victory. I am convinced because the majority of our comrades were determined to completely restructure national life. Remember that back then, Africa was in the throes of a series of coups inspired by young revolutionary officers.
Why coup failed
Without going into
details, there a number of noteworthy factors that explain what happened, among
them, the disclosure of the plot by an officer of presidential security at 3 pm
on April 5; the sending away of certain officers at the presidential palace to
their homes after the disclosure, when they were supposed to arrest the
occupants of the palace (you know whom I am talking about); the about-face of
the airborne commandos from the Koutaba [military base]; the failure to
transmit key instructions to comrades who were camped on the outskirts of the
capital; and I think the failure to create an urban guerilla front, etc…There
were also a number of technical and logistics problems, along with other
subjective factors which I cannot discuss here.
Any regrets?
In all seriousness,
I don’t regret our action. You know, the absence of the rule of law [in
Cameroon today] continues to comfort me in my belief that we were right. What
is the meaning of the recent constitutional revision? What is the meaning of
the creation of ELECAM and the manner in which its members were selected? This
is nothing but a confirmed monarchy. We cannot accept this… in the end, these
two acts constitute fatal errors for this regime.
We want the rule of
law, democracy, social justice and progress. I think that every Cameroonian
today – and I am speaking to all Cameroonians, we must know when to cross the
red line in order to liberate our people from dictatorship. No one, and I mean
no one, will do it for us. It is a collective right and obligation.
Nevertheless, you
want to know if, 25 years later, I regret the actions that we took. In the name
of my comrades, I offer my regrets and my most sincere condolence to the
victims of our actions… It will be irresponsible on my part not to do so.
"Cameroon
will be back"
Last February,
Cameroonians commemorated the first anniversary of the youth revolt. Once again,
I pay a vibrant tribute to all these assassinated youths for saying no to the
fiddling about with the constitution... These youths must be freed without
condition. I also call for the liberation of Lapiro de Mbanga. I am also
thinking of all those imprisoned militants of the SCNC, at a time when dialogue
with these compatriots should prevail, they are being forced into an
escalation... At this beginning of the 21st century, our towns and villages
deserve better... the stakes and challenges are not insurmountable.
"Cameroon will be back."
No comments:
Post a Comment