Beti, Northern elite
bad-mouthing: End time signal for Biya
regime
Of the four geopolitical axes
in Cameroon, Betis and Northerners have been on the driving seat since
reunification. Bamilekes until recently when they were given the position of
the senate president, have been on the corridors of political power while their
Anglophone cousins have at best been on the sidelines.
After the Betis, the grand
north have a commanding presence in Cameroon politics, whether in the
opposition parties or in government. Presently, three Northern opposition
leaders are in the CPDM government. They are the minister of state for tourism
and leisure, Bello Bouba Maigari of the UNDP, Issa Bakary Tchiroma of
communication and Mohamadou Moustapha, special duties minister at the
presidency.
Within the ruling CPDM, Northernerss
co-pilot the New Deal regime, occupy the positions of vice prime
minister in charge of relations with the assemblies, Amadou Ali; minister
of finance, Alamine Ousmane Mey; minister of public contracts, Abba Sadou;
minister of sports and physical
education, Adoum Garoua; minister of environment and nature
protection, Helle Pierre; minister of livestock and animal husbandry; Dr.
Taiga and the minister of basic education, Youssouf Adidja Alim.
Other CPDM northern elite in
government are the minister delegate in charge of relations with the
Islamic world, Adoum Gargoum; the secretary of state in the ministry of public
health, Hayatou Alim; the secretary of
state in the ministry of defence in
charge of ex-servicemen, Koumpa Issa and
the secretary of state in the ministry of forestry and wildlife, Koulsoum
Alhadji.
Despite holding these juicy
positions and many more in state corporations, Northerners are
surprisingly not contented. They had even written the “grand north” memo
complaining bitterly of being on the margin of political and
infrastructural development. Their covert ambition as has been analysed time
without number is to take over from Biya when he eventually leaves power.
Their warp logic is that since
it was one of theirs who handed over the presidency to Paul Biya, it should be
returned to where it came from.
The Betis also argue in hiding
that it should be one of them to take over from Biya. That explains the
vitriolic open exchanges between the Betis and Northerners last week.
Elite of Lekie division had in
a motion to President Biya giving him courage in the war against Boko Haram
made the implication that some members of the new deal in the north were
“accomplices” to the terrorist group which has inflicted harm in the northern
regions. The document, in which Eyebe Ayissi, former external relations
minister and now minister in charge of supreme state audit signed, was
unequivocal in accusing his fellow regime members as if they are enemies in the
house. “No to the accomplices of Boko Haram mainly in the Grand North of
Cameroon and their underhand methods or their attempts to incite the partition
of this country which takes the form of the regrettable developments which have
taken place in other countries or regions in the African continent’.
The memo further fired a
scathing indictment on Northerners for “political blackmail, hostage-
taking and complicity inspired by diverse ends notably political ambitions of
personal or regional interest”.
One of Biya’s close allies
from the north, Hon. Cavaye Djibril, speaker of the national assembly and
political bureau member of the CPDM did not take the Lekie memo kindly. In his
reply on behalf of the north, he said Ayissi’s document was “capable of
instilling hatred among compatriots whose sole desire is to jointly tackle the
pressing challenges of the republic. We denounce these maneuvers which aim
only at tainting the image of one part of the country while fostering
individual positioning.”
Cavaye has said it all; the
rumbling battle between the north and Betis is motivated by the “positioning”
to take over from Biya. The infighting is even more so given that at over 80,
Biya is not grooming a successor which gives room for the open animosity,
accusations and counter finger pointing within the New Deal top brass. Where this
tussle leaves Anglophones who at the worst ought to be next in command in any
regime continues to beg for an answer.
Putting the next of kin tussle
at the backburner, Ayissi has made very severe allegations that for the sake of
“national unity” and security considerations should not be swept aside. Boko
Haram, it has been said over and again is a Nigerian sect, based in Nigeria,
and operating mainly in Nigeria with an occasional swoop on
Cameroon’s north to kidnap hostages for ransom.
Ayisi’s could not have said
there are “accomplices” in the CPDM regime without proof. The least he can now
do is to name them publicly and also submit the names to the security and the
president to order the arrest and trial of the “Boko Haram partners in crime.
If he cannot name names, the option left to President Biya can only be to sack
him with alacrity.
It is not the first time the
nation has been scornfully entertained by open dispute between members of
government from the two blocks. The other day it was Amadou Ali, minister
delegate in charge of relations with the assembles trading covert accusations
with defence minister, Edgar Alain Mebe Ngo’o over the Boko Haram attack
that resulted in the abduction of Ali’s wife.
If there is a bitter lesson
President Biya can learn from the open squabbles between his Beti brothers and
their political rivals in the Grand North, it is that his government is
dangerously divided. Isn’t it said that “united we stand, divided we fall?”
The “motion of support” the president needs now more than ever
before is a new government with a trajectory towards an equitable
representation of all interest groups and not just the dominance of the Betis
and northerners now at each other’s throat to the detriment of national
interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment