Biya beware: Boko Haram is
unlike Macquis, others
“Political
language is essentially bad language because it is usually sentimental and
devoid of facts”. These are the words of the celebrated George Orwell in an
essay titled: “Politics and the English Language.” Orwell cites two statements
on the same subject in two different newspapers, one a pro-government newspaper
and another a newspaper sympathetic to the opposition. Read what the
pro-government newspaper wrote: “The government has taken tough measures against
terrorists”. Below is the one in the pro-opposition newspaper: “The regime has
begun a vicious crackdown on the freedom fighters”.
Such
language-usage was common in Cameroon in the early 90s. The state media
referred to SDF supporters as “vandals” while their party leader called them
“soldiers of democracy,” “hunting dogs” and other endearing names.
President
Biya’s utterances about Boko Haram before leaving for the USA-Africa summit in
Washington constituted what Orwell calls “bad language”. He likened the war he
since declared against Boko Haram to those against the Macquis, propagators of
the “Ghost Towns” operation and the war against Nigeria in Bakassi. Bad
language is synonymous to propaganda language because the facts on the ground
are different. Let us examine the wars which he claimed Cameroon has won one
after another.
The war
against the Macquisards shortened to “Macquis” was a long drawn bloody campaign
against UPC nationalists who wanted Cameroon liberated entirely from the
French. The “Macquis” chose to function from the forest and Ahidjo used not
only the Cameroonian army, but also French military machine to crush them. Um
Nyobe, for instance, was hunted like a wild beast and finally mowed down by a
French machine gun in the forest of Loum. In order to win the sympathy of the
population and build up profound hatred for the “Macquis”, the Ahidjo regime
orchestrated the killing of innocent citizens whose heads were cut and hung
along the public highway and while the “Macquis” were accused of being behind
the killings.
The Biya regime didn’t really crush the
operation “Ghost Towns” activists. It simply manipulated and split the hard
core opposition. Proof that the regime lost the war is the salary cut of close
to 70% which took effect from 1993, approximately two years later. The
“Operation Ghost Towns and Civil Disobedience” dealt the Cameroonian economy a
severe blow. Djeukam Tchameni’s “Carpe Liberte” which came up with the idea of
“Carton Rouge”(Red Card) was so effective in handling the gendarmerie that the
“Ghost Towns” operation registered close to 100% success in Douala despite the
titanic efforts of the late Jean Fochive and Paul Nji Atanga to counter it.
Till date, Atanga boasts that he bought a hundred taxis which security men used
to neutralise the “Ghost Towns” operation in Douala. But Douala residents at
the time would testify that there is more propaganda than truth in that
allegation. We all know that Cameroon got Bakassi thanks to the International
Court of Justice, ICJ ruling, not military force.
Can Cameroon crush Boko
Haram?
The
answer to the question can only be given after a careful examination of the
facts on the ground. Biya made the declaration of war against Boko Haram in far
away Paris and reiterated it at Nsimalen while leaving Cameroon for the US.
Many of us still recall that during the “Ghost Towns” strike action in 19991,
the president visited Douala after receiving threats not to set foot there. “Me
voici a Douala”, he announced while there and encouraged by the applause from
supporters, repeated with emphasis “Me voici donc a Douala”. If he thinks Boko
Haram is like the “Ghost Towns” operation, let him go to the Far North town
where Amadou Ali’s wife was kidnapped and several soldiers killed and declare:
“Me voice a Kolofata!” then proceed to sleep there and see what Boko Haram will
do to him.
When you
declare a war on somebody or a group you move to confront the enemy in his own
territory. You don’t declare a war and wait for the enemy to come and meet you
in your own territory. The Americans have provided useful examples on what to
do after a war declaration. As soon as the US declared war on the suspects of
the attack on the World Trade Centre and the twin Towers of New York, US
fighter jets left for Afghanistan, the base of the terrorists.
The
argument was that if Americans failed to confront the terrorists at their own
doorsteps, they would attack Americans at home as they did on September 11,
2001. Osama Bin Laden was pursued and killed in the heart of Pakistan. Boko
Haram is not hiding like the “Macquis” in the heart of the Equatorial forest in
Cameroon. Its head quarters is the forest of Sambisa in Nigeria. Rather than
seek Goodluck Jonathan’s assistance, Biya has chose but Idryss Derby of Chad,
who, though a former rebel, doesn’t master the Boko Haram terrain like the
Nigerian leader.
The way forward
If
Cameroon is to win the war against Boko Haram, its military must collaborate
with Nigeria and meet Boko Haram in Sambisa forest or wherever the sect’s
headquarters is. The fact we must first
face is that Boko Haram has carried the fight to Cameroon’s own territory.
Immediately Biya declared war against the Islamic sect in Paris, Boko Haram
launched an attack, killing some soldiers and kidnapping Chinese engineers and
carting away ammunition. Not only that. The Nigerian islamic sect is reportedly
recruiting jobless and disgruntled Cameroonians. It has reportedly recruited
500 youths from Hon. Cavaye Djibril’s Mayo Sava division.
Biya must also reconcile with fellow
Cameroonians. Biya is yet to convince fellow Cameroonians that his policy of
empowering fellow Betis and running the country as a personal estate is for the
good of the nation. No army, however, well trained, can win a war without the
collaboration of the population; especially an unconventional war against a
faceless formidable enemy like Boko Haram.
Finally,
Biya should also stop carrying fire and water in the same mouth: fighting Boko
Haram and negotiating at the same time with them to free those abducted.
Neither the US nor Nigeria negotiates with terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment